Skip to main content

Ludum Dare 24 Results

The voting has finally finished and the Ludum Dare 24 results are finally out. My game, frankly, did a lot better than I expected:

  • Humour #36
  • Fun #239
  • Mood #296
  • Overall #417
  • Graphics #600
  • Innovation #603
  • Audio #615
  • Theme #672

There were 1006 entries in the 48 hour competition. I'd been hoping to finish in the top half of the rankings this time after a poor showing last time and that's what I managed: 417th overall.

The big surprise was the humour score: wow! I was worried that the humour might be a bit too straight-faced for people, or that I'd be the only one who found it funny. Being wrong has rarely been a happier experience!

I was also really pleased with the Fun score. To me that's the most important category after Overall. It means I made something that people enjoyed playing and that's a really rewarding feeling.

It was nice to get a decent score for the mood category too, but I've never really understood what it means exactly. The other scores were more or less what I expected, except for audio: I didn't have any, so ranking above 391 others was a bit of a surprise!

I think if these results tell me anything, it's not to give up. It's still possible to make a decent game, even when you're starting over with less than 24 hours remaining in the competition. Also: the Ludum Dare community is awesome!

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to outperform std::vector in 1 easy step

Everyone who's familiar with C++ knows that you should avoid resizing a std::vector inside a loop wherever possible. The reasoning's pretty obvious: the memory allocated for the vector doubles in size each time it fills up and that doubling is a costly operation. Have you ever wondered why it's so costly though? It's tempting to assume that because implementations of the STL have been around for so long that they must be pretty efficient. It turns out that's a bad assumption because the problem, in this case, is the standard itself: specifically, the allocator interface. The allocator interface provides two methods that obtain and release memory: allocate allocates uninitialized storage (public member function) deallocate deallocates storage (public member function) (taken from this page ). What's missing is a   way of growing an existing memory allocation in place. In C this is provided by the realloc function, but there's no equiva...
2 comments
Read more

Triangle bounding boxes in a single byte

Just thought of a way to store the bounding box for a single triangle in only one byte. It's not really practical or something you'd ever really want to use, but what the hell. Assume we have some kind of indexed mesh structure with a list of vertex positions and a list of triangle indices:   struct Mesh {     std::vector<vec3> verts;     std::vector<uvec3> triangles;   }; We can find the bounding box of a triangle by taking the min and max of all three vertices:   vec3 Mesh::lowerBound(uint32_t tri) const {     vec3 v0 = verts[triangles[tri].x];     vec3 v1 = verts[triangles[tri].y];     vec3 v2 = verts[triangles[tri].z];     return min(min(v0, v1), v2);   }   vec3 Mesh::upperBound(uint32_t tri) const {     vec3 v0 = verts[triangles[tri].x];     vec3 v1 = verts[triangles[tri].y];     vec3 v2 = verts[triangles[tri].z];     return ...
2 comments
Read more

Solar Sailor: semi-playable

More progress! Solar Sailor is now kinda- sorta- playable. You can't win or lose yet, but it does have all this goodness: There are gates that you have to pass through. There's a direction line showing you which gate you have to pass through next. The NPC racers now have some basic AI and will actually try to fly through the gates instead of just drifting serenely and hoping for the best. You can try it out yourself here! If you can't be bothered to try it out, this is what it's looking like now: If you do try it, I'd really appreciate any feedback - especially bug reports!
2 comments
Read more